Can
there be a spirit of Gandhi without Gandhi? A spirit of MLK without MLK? The
spirit lives when the flesh dies but the temporary must come before the
permanent. God as a physical being generated a fatherly spirit. When he emptied
himself and became human, the fatherly spirit remained. Jesus acknowledged this
in John 4:24. Jesus generated his own spirit, but it didn't blossom into its
strongest point of inspiration and influence until he left earth. The spirit is
not an individual but an idea or concept created by individual action and
behavior. We acknowledge this all the time, and is an aspect of common wisdom,
but we tend to make it something that it's not when we apply it to religion. It
only makes sense that the greatest individual (God) would generate the greatest,
most influential spirit.
These
are just my thoughts and as far as I know no one else has articulated them
quite the way I have. As you notice, I don't deny God as Father, Son, or Holy
Spirit. I'm just putting my own particular spin on them.
No comments:
Post a Comment